+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Power Five Conferences approved by NCAA

  1. #1
    Moderator BamaHoHo has a great deal of respect on the forumsBamaHoHo has a great deal of respect on the forumsBamaHoHo has a great deal of respect on the forumsBamaHoHo has a great deal of respect on the forumsBamaHoHo has a great deal of respect on the forumsBamaHoHo has a great deal of respect on the forumsBamaHoHo has a great deal of respect on the forumsBamaHoHo has a great deal of respect on the forumsBamaHoHo has a great deal of respect on the forumsBamaHoHo has a great deal of respect on the forumsBamaHoHo has a great deal of respect on the forums BamaHoHo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Tuscaloosa,AL
    Age
    54
    Posts
    20,645
    Rep Power
    1817675

    Power Five Conferences approved by NCAA


  2. #2
    Sergeant Major of SEC Fanatics Corps Dr.SwineSmeller has a great deal of respect on the forumsDr.SwineSmeller has a great deal of respect on the forumsDr.SwineSmeller has a great deal of respect on the forumsDr.SwineSmeller has a great deal of respect on the forumsDr.SwineSmeller has a great deal of respect on the forumsDr.SwineSmeller has a great deal of respect on the forumsDr.SwineSmeller has a great deal of respect on the forumsDr.SwineSmeller has a great deal of respect on the forumsDr.SwineSmeller has a great deal of respect on the forumsDr.SwineSmeller has a great deal of respect on the forumsDr.SwineSmeller has a great deal of respect on the forums Dr.SwineSmeller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    White House
    Posts
    18,186
    Rep Power
    2661548

    Re: Power Five Conferences approved by NCAA

    Bout time.

  3. #3
    Moderator BamaHoHo has a great deal of respect on the forumsBamaHoHo has a great deal of respect on the forumsBamaHoHo has a great deal of respect on the forumsBamaHoHo has a great deal of respect on the forumsBamaHoHo has a great deal of respect on the forumsBamaHoHo has a great deal of respect on the forumsBamaHoHo has a great deal of respect on the forumsBamaHoHo has a great deal of respect on the forumsBamaHoHo has a great deal of respect on the forumsBamaHoHo has a great deal of respect on the forumsBamaHoHo has a great deal of respect on the forums BamaHoHo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Tuscaloosa,AL
    Age
    54
    Posts
    20,645
    Rep Power
    1817675

    Re: Power Five Conferences approved by NCAA

    From ESPN

    Brett McMurphy discusses the poll conducted by ESPN in which a relative majority of the Power Five conference coaches favors a schedule consisting of only Power Five opponents.


    Many of the Power Five conference coaches in college football told ESPN that they favor a schedule consisting of only Power Five opponents.
    Of the 65 Power Five coaches from the ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, Pac-12, SEC and Notre Dame, 46 percent (30 coaches) favored playing exclusively Power Five opponents while 35 percent (23 coaches) were opposed. About 18.5 percent (12 coaches) were undecided.







    The Pac-12, Big 12 and SEC coaches favored playing all Power Five opponents, while the ACC coaches were against it by a 6-4 margin with four coaches undecided. Big Ten coaches were divided: Six each were for and against it, with two undecided.



    The coaches, who were in Bristol, Connecticut, last month, were asked whether they would favor all Power Five conferences playing their respective conference schedules and then scheduling all nonconference games against other Power Five teams. Because of the tougher schedules under this hypothetical scenario, teams would not be required to reach six wins to play in a bowl.

    The Pac-12, Big 12 and SEC coaches favored playing all Power Five opponents, while the ACC coaches were against it by a 6-4 margin with four coaches undecided. Big Ten coaches were divided: Six each were for and against it, with two undecided.

    Alabama coach Nick Saban said "fans want" Power Five teams playing exclusively Power Five opponents.

    "We need to be more concerned about the people who support the programs and the university and come and see the games," Saban said. "Those are the most important. But we never think about that."



    Voting results

    ACC
    YES:
    Clemson's Dabo Swinney, Miami's Al Golden, Pitt's Paul Chryst, Virginia Tech's Frank Beamer
    NO: Duke's David Cutcliffe, Florida State's Jimbo Fisher, Georgia Tech's Paul Johnson, North Carolina's Larry Fedora, NC State's Dave Doeren, Wake Forest's Dave Clawson
    Undecided: Boston College's Steve Addazio, Louisville's Bobby Petrino, Syracuse's Scott Shafer, Virginia's Mike London

    Big Ten
    YES:
    Maryland's Randy Edsall, Michigan's Brady Hoke, Michigan State's Mark Dantonio, Nebraska's Bo Pelini, Northwestern's Pat Fitzgerald, Purdue's Darrell Hazell
    NO: Illinois' Tim Beckman, Indiana's Kevin Wilson, Iowa's Kirk Ferentz, Ohio State's Urban Meyer, Rutgers' Kyle Flood, Wisconsin's Gary Andersen
    Undecided: Minnesota's Jerry Kill, Penn State's James Franklin

    Big 12
    YES:
    Baylor's Art Briles, Kansas' Charlie Weis, Iowa State's Paul Rhoads, Oklahoma's Bob Stoops, Oklahoma State's Mike Gundy, West Virginia's Dana Holgorsen
    NO: Kansas State's Bill Snyder, Texas' Charlie Strong, TCU's Gary Patterson, Texas Tech's Kliff Kingsbury

    Independent
    NO:
    Notre Dame's Brian Kelly

    Pac-12
    YES:
    Arizona State's Todd Graham, Oregon's Mark Helfrich, Oregon State's Mike Riley, Stanford's David Shaw, UCLA's Jim Mora, Washington's Chris Petersen, USC's Steve Sarkisian
    NO: Arizona's Rich Rodriguez
    Undecided: Cal's Sonny Dykes, Colorado's Mike MacIntyre, Utah's Kyle Whittingham, Washington State's Mike Leach

    SEC
    YES:
    Alabama's Nick Saban, Florida's Will Muschamp, Kentucky's Mark Stoops, LSU's Les Miles, Mississippi State's Dan Mullen, Ole Miss' Hugh Freeze, Tennessee's Butch Jones
    NO: Arkansas' Bret Bielema, Georgia's Mark Richt, Missouri's Gary Pinkel, South Carolina's Steve Spurrier, Vanderbilt's Derek Mason
    Undecided: Auburn's Gus Malzahn, Texas A&M's Kevin Sumlin



    Coaches from the Pac-12, whose schools already play nine league games, were the biggest proponents of a Power Five-exclusive schedule: seven in favor, one against and four undecided.

    The Pac-12 coaches, such as Stanford's David Shaw, prefer the Power Five-only schedule model because they want each conference to play the same type of schedule. The Pac-12 is the only league that plays nine conference games and has a league title game.

    Arizona's Rich Rodriguez, the lone dissenting Pac-12 coach, said "some of those [Group of Five teams] are better than the so-called 'haves' [Power Five teams]."

    The Group of Five FBS conferences are the American, Conference USA, Mid-American, Mountain West and Sun Belt.

    A couple of coaches in favor of Power Five-only opponents suggested having future nonconference opponents determined by how each team finished in its conference the previous season, similar to the NFL's scheduling model.

    Arizona State's Todd Graham, who was in favor, echoed Saban's comments that fans prefer the Power Five teams playing one another.

    "Fans want to see those games," Graham said. "Players want to play in them, and coaches want to coach in them."

    Big 12 coaches favored it by a 6-4 margin, but Kansas State's Bill Snyder was against it. Snyder's reasoning was that the Wildcats annually need seven home games because of the amount of money brought into the Manhattan, Kansas, community. By playing only Power Five opponents, Snyder said K-State would not be able to schedule seven home games each season.

    Texas' Charlie Strong also was against it because he said the Longhorns are committed to playing an annual home game against a Group of Five school from Texas. The Longhorns have played a smaller in-state school in three of the past five seasons and open this year against North Texas.

    Big Ten coaches were split on the matter.

    "The Power Five conferences is a different world," said Maryland's Randy Edsall, who was in favor of it. "The scheduling would be more well-rounded and would show who deserves to be in the [four-team] playoff."

    Nebraska's Bo Pelini, who was in favor, was one of several coaches that said Power Five schools playing exclusively Power Five schools would make the job of ranking the teams by the College Football Playoff's selection committee simpler.

    "Everyone would be on the same playing field," Pelini said. "It would be easier for the selection committee to rank the teams with the schools having more common opponents."

    Pelini was among several coaches who think the four-team playoff will quickly expand to eight teams.

    "There's five power leagues and only four of those will make it, so someone is going to get pissed off," Pelini said. "That's why we'll eventually have an eight-team playoff."

    Michigan State's Mark Dantonio said playing only Power Five opponents would make it easier "to find a true champion. If teams don't play similar opponents, it gets skewed."

    Miami's Al Golden and Saban also said that playing exclusively Power Five opponents would help the selection committee pick the best four teams.

    In the current setup, when all conferences play different opponents (Power Five, Group of Five and FCS opponents), Saban said a team can be eliminated from the four-team playoff with one regular-season loss. By playing exclusively Power Five opponents, it would be harder for teams to go undefeated and teams wouldn't be penalized for one loss, Saban said.

    "I don't like the pressure if you might lose one game and you're out [of the playoff]," Saban said. "It's difficult to play 12 good games, but if not everyone is in that situation, it might be easier for them to go undefeated.

    "I think some fundamental changes have to be made before anybody would be interested in [a Power Five-only schedule]."

    Indiana's Kevin Wilson was against it. He said he wasn't sure fans could adjust to the bigger schools' no longer scheduling nonconference games against smaller schools. And he wondered whether fans would accept an NFL-like setup where half of the Power Five teams would win and lose.

    "Can everyone handle .500 football every week?" Wilson said

    Wisconsin's Gary Andersen, Missouri's Gary Pinkel and Iowa's Kirk Ferentz also were against it.

    Andersen, the former Utah State coach, and Pinkel, formerly at Toledo, wondered how the smaller schools could survive without playing the Power Five schools. Some smaller schools receive more than $1 million to play at a Power Five opponent.

    "Where do teams like Utah State go to get a big game?" Andersen said.

    Ferentz even predicted the Big Ten would play 10 conference games "in the near future." The league currently has eight league games but is moving to nine in 2016 and will eventually eliminate games against FCS teams.

    LSU's Les Miles, one of seven SEC coaches who were in favor, believes that "we're headed that way" to Power Five-only schedules.

    Mississippi State's Dan Mullen, who also favored it, said that if the schools played only Power Five opponents, they would need more scholarship players and expanded eligibility.

    Even though Notre Dame has never played an FCS team and plays almost exclusively Power Five opponents already, Irish coach Brian Kelly said he would be against it if it meant no longer playing Navy.

    Kelly said removing Navy from Notre Dame's schedule would be "a deal-breaker." Even with teams playing tougher schedules, Kelly said he doesn't favor teams with losing records playing in bowls.

    North Carolina's Larry Fedora was against the idea because he said the Group of Five league teams "can't survive without us. It would not be good for college football."

  4. #4
    Moderator BamaHoHo has a great deal of respect on the forumsBamaHoHo has a great deal of respect on the forumsBamaHoHo has a great deal of respect on the forumsBamaHoHo has a great deal of respect on the forumsBamaHoHo has a great deal of respect on the forumsBamaHoHo has a great deal of respect on the forumsBamaHoHo has a great deal of respect on the forumsBamaHoHo has a great deal of respect on the forumsBamaHoHo has a great deal of respect on the forumsBamaHoHo has a great deal of respect on the forumsBamaHoHo has a great deal of respect on the forums BamaHoHo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Tuscaloosa,AL
    Age
    54
    Posts
    20,645
    Rep Power
    1817675

    Re: Power Five Conferences approved by NCAA

    Perfect non-conference rivalries fans should demand for every SEC team

    With the SEC’s new schedule mandate, every SEC team has to play a Big 5 conference member from either the ACC, Big 12, Big Ten or Pac-12 annually. Since Florida, Georgia, Kentucky and South Carolina already play one, let’s look at some perfect non-conference rivalries for the other SEC teams:

    Alabama vs. Ohio State: As if you needed any more ammunition: Nick Saban vs. Urban Meyer. Enough said. Two powerhouse programs with championship aspirations going head-to-head annually would essentially be an elimination game. Urban Meyer’s lip is quivering as you’re reading this at the mere thought of Saban game planning for his offense.

    Arkansas vs. Baylor: In a battle of polar opposites, Arkansas and Baylor would actually renew a Southwest Conference rivalry. The Hogs have played more games against Baylor than any SEC school (69). Bret Bielema vs. Art Briles: the storylines write themselves.

    Auburn vs. Oregon: The greatest show on turf could be great every year. Oregon is still pissed off about Cam Newton and Michael Dyer, and the two fastest offenses in college football would turn into a track meet, although Auburn could rent a local youth league team to take care of Oregon in the trenches. I’m only kidding, kind of.

    LSU vs. Southern Cal: LSU has thumped nearly every other Pac-12 team they’ve played; now it’s time for one of the biggest players in the league, USC. The Trojans have been a historical NFL producer every year, not to mention a championship contender, as has LSU. Let’s put the Trojans and Tigers on a neutral field and play some power football. This could be a fun annual rivalry.

    Mississippi State vs. Oklahoma: We can’t have SEC annual rivalries without playing one of the storied powerhouses in college football: Oklahoma. Yes, MSU will always be the underdog, but MSU’s brand could really take off should it defeat the Sooners. It would boost recruiting in Oklahoma and Texas, too. Let’s do this!

    Missouri vs. Kansas: Bring back the damned Border War, okay? Gary Pinkel said in May the invitation is open, but there’s still hard feelings in Kansas. Fresh off an SEC East crown, maybe Kansas doesn’t want anything to do with Mizzou at this stage in the game.

    Ole Miss vs. Penn State: Two of the up-and-coming coaches in the country in Hugh Freeze and James Franklin are trying to build their clubs into legitimate national championship contenders.

    Tennessee vs. Michigan: Two historic but recently fallen programs could clash annually in two of the largest stadiums in college football. Tennessee fans are still bitter over Charles Woodson winning the Heisman over Peyton Manning.

    Texas A&M vs. Texas: This doesn’t really need to be explained, does it? Texas still refuses to play Texas A&M, but what Texas doesn’t realize is they need the Aggies more. Both fan bases want it, but leadership at each school doesn’t want anything to do with it.

    Vanderbilt vs. Duke: The battle of the academics would be a nice addition to the SEC-ACC rivalries. With similar fan bases and reasonable distance, this could turn into an all-out war. Duke’s David Cutcliffe is offensive-minded, while Vanderbilt’s Derek Mason is defensive-minded. Both schools will have some nice recruiting battles over the same prospects in the future, I’m sure.

  5. #5
    Moderator MKfromPA has a great deal of respect on the forumsMKfromPA has a great deal of respect on the forumsMKfromPA has a great deal of respect on the forumsMKfromPA has a great deal of respect on the forumsMKfromPA has a great deal of respect on the forumsMKfromPA has a great deal of respect on the forumsMKfromPA has a great deal of respect on the forumsMKfromPA has a great deal of respect on the forumsMKfromPA has a great deal of respect on the forumsMKfromPA has a great deal of respect on the forumsMKfromPA has a great deal of respect on the forums MKfromPA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    SW Louisiana
    Age
    28
    Posts
    4,809
    Rep Power
    1922926

    Re: Power Five Conferences approved by NCAA

    Personally I would enjoy it if the NCAA eventually mandated all schools from the Power Five only schedule non-conference games against other FBS schools. No more FCS "cupcake" games. I believe this would help with the strength of schedule debate, increase attendance across the country, and create match ups that fans would actually want to watch. Gone would be the stupid "rent-a-win" philosophy. Seriously, what does playing an FCS opponent tell a fan about their team? IMO not very much meaningful. I think it's a waste of time, money, and a game. Of all the decisions the NCAA makes, maybe they could see the light here.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Stockton, CA Bankruptcy Approved...
    By gatormaniac in forum SECFanatics Think Tank
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 04-02-2013, 04:02 PM
  2. Approved by a Moderator
    By Angry Beaver in forum Terry's Pub
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 12-12-2012, 05:34 PM
  3. OU BOR grants President full power to switch conferences
    By GatorMan32 in forum Non-SEC Football
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-21-2011, 12:21 AM
  4. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-09-2007, 09:48 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts